Navigation Bar (Jump to Menu)
This study was commissioned by Blake Hartill, CFA, of Gold Stock Research, a division of Downstate Securities Group, Inc., 259 Indian Rocks Road North, Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770, 1-727-518-9101, fax: 1-727-559-8889.
We are grateful to Mr. Hartill for suggesting the idea and for giving Topline permission to publish this study. The entire study, including high resolution charts (through 3/10/2000, is available for download in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format.
Note: This study was written using data through the
close on Friday, March 10th, 2000, and it was sent to Mr. Hartill's clients
the following week.
It also was featured in the April 12th issue of Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letters.
Click for charts updated through April 4th, 2000
Some browsers will download the file automatically when
you click the link. Some browsers will open the file.
MS Internet Explorer users: If you right-click the file name, you will get a choice to view or download the file.
Netscape users: If you hold down the left shift key as you click the link, it will download it rather than open it.
You will need an Adobe Acrobat Reader, it's a free download from Adobe.
What's an Acrobat file?
1) The growth rate of the NASDAQ has become extreme.
on the second chart is growing at 86% per year. There is no historical
precedent for any stock market index sustaining a growth rate of 86% per year
for a prolonged period (unless it's measured in a currency whose value is
collapsing, e.g., paper Marks from 1917-23). Trendline
is growing at 279% annually.
From January 28th to March 10th, the NASDAQ rose 29.9%. For comparison, in the six weeks before the 1929 peak, the DJIA only grew 10.9%. In the twenty-one weeks before March 10th, the NASDAQ rose 87.8%. In the entire history of the DJIA going back to 1885, the only time the twenty-one week percent change was that high was in 1933, rebounding off the 1932 lows.
This is truly extreme growth. It is scary how much of the public considers the growth in the NASDAQ since October 1999 as normal, or a little better than normal for a bull market.
2) The NASDAQ could drop substantially without even breaking most of these trendlines.
The NASDAQ is way above five of these trendlines, and is even still above trendline .
i. Today's close of 4,706.63 is over 36% above trendline , (that is growing at 86% per year).
ii. Today's close is over 139% above trendline , (that is growing at 21% per year).
iii. Today's close is over 242% above trendline ¸ (that connects the 1975 and 1994 lows, and is growing at 12.7% per year).
v. Today's close is over 135% above trendline ·, the upper parallel channel to the LSF trendline.
Even someone who clings to the mega-bullish premise that the NASDAQ will continue to grow at 86% per year, would have to admit that a decline back to trendline º would not violate his hypothesis (of 86% growth per year). That’s a 26% decline from today’s close, and a decline of over 31% from Friday’s peak at 5,048.62. Many analysts define bear markets in stocks as declines of 23.1% or more, (those declines which require an advance of at least 30% to be retraced). A pullback to trendline º would qualify as a bear market. Declines to the other trendlines would dwarf that pullback.